Tuesday, October 07, 2008

Religionist?

From the Press Association:

More than 20 young Muslims are to be given direct access to Cabinet ministers to advise on issues affecting their everyday lives, it was announced today.

The Young Muslim Advisory Group of 22 young men and women aged between 16 and 25 years old, will talk to ministers and policy-makers about issues affecting their day-to-day lives.

And guess who launched it? The woman whose favourite food is also her mental state: Hazel Blears.

Ms Blears said: "Ensuring young Muslims have access to constructive, democratic channels for dealing with concerns and frustrations is crucial to our efforts to build strong, resilient communities.

"The contribution young people can make to finding solutions to issues in society often goes unrecognised and untapped."

Why is that? Why are they getting special treatment? Because a few of them like to strap on explosives and inconvenience people by blowing things up? The government clearly haven't been listening to that supernanny woman because by being so selective and religionist (how else do I describe it?)it is rewarding them for being difficult, stubborn, expensive and in some cases, murdering fuckheads.

Why not young Hindus? Or young atheists? They don't get special treatment because they don't belong in the all same circles in the Venn diagram to those who like to fly planes into buildings and blow up embassies?

So fucking what.

I don't particularly like their religion which says that women aren't equal to men (quite right, they are superior) and they should kill me for not thinking Allah is the only God or similar.

Haven't we worked out that this mamby pamby bleeding heart socialist 'oh they've behaved badly it must be all my fault' bullshit doesn't work?

I am furious at this; maybe because it's just another example of how this pathetic group of people who we pay to ruin this country and make our lives as difficult as possible simply won't learn and preach equality whilst doing everything they can to ensure that certain people get a fucking easy, cushy life and never have to grow up and take responsibility.

I was told the other day that even if a Hindu couple have a Hindu ceremony which lasts about a week and a half (okay, 6 hours) they still have to have a civil ceremony to make it legal but Muslims don't.

How is that fair? How is that equal? How is that encouraging 'community cohesion'?
To quote P J O'Rourke, it's the integrational equivalent of giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys.

But will they listen? Will they learn? Will they bugger.

2 comments:

Mark Wadsworth said...

I'd disagree that women are superior to men generally, but women are certainly superior to Muslims or the twats who love to pander to them.

Obnoxio The Clown said...

Pass the popcorn ...